What about the apology?

In regards to the anti-semitic remarks made during his arrest for a DUI, Gibson's apology was definitely appropriate. It probably would have created an even larger uprising had he not apologized, considering how colossal of a public figure he is.

Had the incident simply involved a DUI, Gibson could have probably gotten away with saying that he just acted irrationally. The public would have been very forgiving; actors are people, too, and people can always get too carried away with alcohol. Because Gibson tossed in those anti-semite remarks, however, his situation changed drastically. Those remarks instantly made him a target as a source of prejudice and anti-semitism. He then had to publicly apologize and admit to saying those things even in light of the previously alleged anti-semitic notions of his film "The Passion of the Christ."

The apology itself was pretty all-inclusive. He only left out his exact wording when referring to his remarks. Jewish community leaders, however, were unsatisfied. This incident required more than a simple apology, as Gibson has many more bases to cover in regards to his alleged anti-semitism than this one DUI. Of course, the apology helps his case. If he didn't apologize, some people might have been after his life. Regardless, he owes more than a public, televised statement. At this point, only further action to actually demonstrate his sincerity will convince the Jewish community he is not an anti-semite.

Gibson's Drunken Tirade

On July 28 2006, Oscar-winning actor and director Mel Gibson was arrested on a DUI charge by local police in Malibu, California. A breathalyzer test confirmed Gibson's BAC as .12%, clearly exceeding the state's legal limit of .08%. Upon arrest, Gibson made several anti-semitic remarks to officer James Mee, voicing such profanities as "f***ing jews" and "the jews are responsible for all the wars in the world". Gibson was later contained in a detox-cell until he posted bail the following morning. That next saturday, he issued the following statement.

Initially, one may see this particular incident as simply a feat of drunkenness, where unintentional remarks are made due to the effects of alcohol on the brain. In this case, however, Mel Gibson was not only reprimanded for drunk driving. His anti-semitism has been in question since the release of his graphic film "The Passion of the Christ," due mostly to its very explicit depiction of jewish discrimination in biblical times. It also doesn't help the case when Gibson's father, Hutton Gibson, has been quoted to deny the occurrence of the Holocaust.

Does/did the Jewish community deserve in an apology? Absolutely. Gibson has a lot of ground to cover in terms of totally clearing any anti-semitic sentiment he is alluded to have. His apology seemed fair, as he openly admitted to making those anti-semitic remarks, though it is not the only task he must complete before he is essentially "acquitted" by his peers.

Critical Thinking in Music

Hey Bloggers,

In this next post, we are supposed to answer whether or not our respective field incorporates aspects of critical thinking. I imagine that music certainly does!

While working on this paper, I have to come to agree with many of Bloom's ideas within his taxonomy about the levels of developmental cognitive thinking. Three stand out in my mind: synthesis, analysis, evaluation. In our own classes that we've taken so far, I think most would agree that synthesis and analysis are very much present in everything we do in music. In order to properly analyze a piece, it is important to decipher chord structure, identify non-harmonic tones and detect logical changes in harmony; all of these are abilities that involve not only thinking frequently, but also thinking critically. Essentially, they involve taking many factors into account and forming a well-thought, reasoned decision based on what is present.

This idea also involves the process of evaluation, our ability to look at music and understand everything about it to the point where we can make logical changes or even add on to it. We even evaluate while we perform, if you think about it. Some would say that thinking about air support, fingerings and sound quality is simply thinking a lot. As musicians, however, we take all of these factors and comprehend them to a degree so that we know exactly what to do next to reach the best end result. That's what thinking critically is essentially based on, right? Finding the best possible answer to a question with sound evidence and a valid argument? I think so.

Feel free to post any other suggestions on how you think music enhances our critical thinking skills!

The Fallacy of Assumed Supremacy

In his article “A German Lesson: the Fallacy of One True Path” Daniel Jonah Goldhagen carefully underlines an interesting connection between Pope Benedict XVI’s rejection of the concept of “relativism” and the imperialistic attitude of the Nazis.

One of the first possible sources of this attitude that Goldhagen notes is the Pope’s past involvement in the Hitler youth. Although he abandoned his military duties only one month before the end of the war, Goldhagen suggests that his involvement nonetheless supports the little conversation about the horrors of the Holocaust. He then continues to explain Benedict’s rejection of the concept of “relativism,” the idea that other religions could have possible pathways towards salvation. Such a rejection is quite comparable to the Nazi attitude and its utter sense of supremacy over the Jews.

I imagine that Goldhagen makes this analogy between the current Pope and the Nazi regime to pinpoint the fallacy behind declaring Catholicism as the one true path, declaring the concept as German because of the failure of Nazi Germany to make one true race. In his “Dominus Jesus” Pope Benedict XVI declared the need for the supremacy of the Catholic Church in the modern world and that all further dialogue with other religions should include “the necessity of conversion to Jesus Christ.” This idea of Catholic supremacy over the world directly correlates to the same concept the Nazis had in mind, the only difference being a religion as opposed to a whole race of people. Essentially, the fallacy lies in the Pope’s belief that what he deems as truth is the Truth, just as the Nazis so fervently believed. Simply because either party deemed themselves as “all-powerful” does not actually make their word supreme over that of others. The “because I said so” argument does not work anymore.

California Dream Song Revisited

Hey Bloggers,

So, after pretty much wrapping up this second draft, I haven't really changed my ideas about the song I chose that much. Originally, though, I thought my choice was not that great, thinking that I would not have much to go with to write a full blown paper. Now, however, I feel confident in the main points I have decided to discuss.

Aside from that, I think both my perception of the California Dream and that of the song's remains the same. I see it very much as an escape from a dismal lifestyle, troubled by mistakes or misfortunes from the past. Their practical resolution is to go to California so this problem can be fixed.

One new idea though. Perhaps the song is not directly referring to California as a place in this case, but maybe a state of mind? It seems that way, since they never actually talk about going to any actual location for any particular reason. They just seem to call their escape or refuge "California" since that's what the actual state of California represents. If they perceive California to be a mindset rather than an actual place, that could make sense in the context of this song.

All comments are welcome!

Songs of California

Hello fellow Bloggers!

Since our writing assignment thus far is to post our potential choice for a song about California, I figured I would post my choice, some ideas and a video/music clip.

After trying to decide from about four different choices, I've decided to use "Meet Me in California" by the Plain White T's as the song for this first paper. The lyrics make sense for the most part. The singer mainly talks about an undesirable situation at home where he "wishes that [he] could start again, peel the past like sunburned skin." He also describes the night where he makes his decision to leave as "a bible verse with pages torn and missing words, condemning me and I'm on my knees." Obviously, the conditions of his life at home could be improved, and he feels that going to California will rectify them.

I also imagine that he is talking to a woman whom he cares about, considering that he mentions how he "doesn't want to see [her] cry, [he] just wants to see [her] smile again." For them, in this sense, the California Dream involves leaving a dreary life behind for a bright new future in what some people refer to as the promised land. The singer also indicates in the verse, " 'cause you know in California there's something better for us all,"that California is a place of refuge for anyone who needs it.

For someone who does not particularly like alternative rock that much, I find the song pretty catchy. The music seems simple, but varies just enough so that the message is still understandable and isn't ignored by monotonous sounding tunes. Here is a link to the lyrics. Below you'll find an audio track from YouTube.